Video Card suitability ?
5 min read
I think there's some confusion here as to how the CPU and the RAM interact with a graphics card. In effect, they don't really at all - not in the manner you are thinking, so it does not matter what CPU or how much RAM you have. It is the job of the motherboard to "handle" or support the graphics card, not the CPU. And since graphics cards come populated with their own RAM, 1Gb in your case, your 2Gb of system RAM don't affect the card either.Would the chip handle the card and is 2 GB of ram enough for my moderate screen size and settings?
So if your motherboard supports your graphics card, and the motherboard supports your CPU and RAM, they will play well together.
The only concern you need to worry about is your PSU having the right connectors and enough horsepower to power the card - and you indicate that is not a problem. And of course drivers, which are for the operating system, are crucial too, and which you also addressed already.
Actually, in today's graphics oriented world, upgrading the graphics solution is a very effective way to increase the overall performance of a computer. This is because the more capable the graphics solution, the more tasks the CPU can hand off to it. And it takes very little CPU horsepower to hand off tasks.
BTW - for future reference, "chip" is slang for integrated circuit or "IC" and note there are dozens of ICs on a motherboard. A single RAM module will typically have 8 or 16 ICs mounted on each stick. The CPU is an IC, and so is the GPU on your new graphics card. The integrated sound device is an IC, and the other devices on the motherboard (network interface, drive controllers, USB controllers, etc. ) consists of ICs. The "chipset" - the brains of the motherboard is an IC, as is the BIOS module and the CMOS module. So to avoid confusion, if you mean the CPU, you should say "CPU", and not "chip".
That was a very fascinating reply Digerati.
Except for some faily basic knowledge of how all those bits of hardware inside of a PC effect and react with each other, it's all a bit of a mystery to me.. I am going to spend some time from now on doing a bit of reading about it though. I'll try to avoid sites full of myths and legends.
As you mentioned, the two items of greatest importance seem to be the PSU and the mainboard.
So on that account ….
Antec Neo 550w High Efficency PSU.
This one: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/361
MSI K9N (nVidia 570 Ultra chipset) specs. and review:
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware…k9n-sli-deluxe/
I only very recently installed the latest Bios from the stock one that originally was on the mainboard. Everything seems very stable.
So, good to go with the more powerful card arriving here soon?
PS:
As I earlier said, I'm not into gaming in any big way, so my knowledge about gaming 'rigs' is very limited.
Why do people (gamers especially) go on and on about super powerful CPUs …"Got to have a 3.0GHz CPU at least!" ?
And all this business about over-clocking (a big no,no for me) to 'improve' gaming performance? Plain Ignorance?
That is not always easy - so you need to check multiple sites.I'll try to avoid sites full of myths and legends.
I have used Antecs PSU (and cases) for years.
Pretty much, it is all about bragging rights. The problem is some folks don't understand, as I say in my sig, heat is bane of all electronics. And overclocking puts a huge burden on cooling.As I earlier said, I'm not into gaming in any big way, so my knowledge about gaming 'rigs' is very limited.
Why do people (gamers especially) go on and on about super powerful CPUs …"Got to have a 3.0GHz CPU at least!" ?
And all this business about over-clocking (a big no,no for me) to 'improve' gaming performance? Plain Ignorance?
What I think is a shame is motherboard makers build in overclocking abilities in their motherboards, and even the CPU makers talk about overclocking. And many of the HW review sites concentrate on overclocking abilities as a criteria for this CPU being "better" than that. BUT, the problem is there is no motherboard maker that will cover damage caused by overclocking. And neither Intel nor AMD cover damage from overclocking.
BUT, the problem is there is no motherboard maker that will cover damage caused by overclocking. And neither Intel nor AMD cover damage from overclocking.
Nor should they, IMO.
But since they don't and won't, they should keep their advertisements focused on stock performance specs, instead of inviting the wonders of OC.
I'm sure it is not uncommon, but I have an old ASUS MoBo, of which the first item in the BIOS is OC adjustments.
Ask AI
AI can make mistakes. Check the cited posts. Archived advice can be out-of-date
Don't include personal information. Questions and selected public posts go to OpenAI. About Ask AI