This is a read-only archive. No new posts or registrations. Privacy Page
Discussion

The Microsoft Protection Racket

1 min read

This thread's last reply is from . Advice, software, and links below may be out of date — treat specific steps and download links with caution.

FYI…

- http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1869377,00.asp
"Does Microsoft think it is going to get away with charging real money for any sort of add-on, service, or new product that protects clients against flaws in its own operating system? Does the existence of this not constitute an incredible conflict of interest? Why improve the base code when you can sell "protection"? Is Frank Nitti the new CEO?…Now if all this new protection software is Microsoft's way of throwing in the towel and admitting that it has failed to secure the OS and cannot guarantee that it will ever secure the OS, then why isn't it simply included with the Windows XP package in the first place?…

Microsoft talks about how when it releases Vista, there will be various versions such as Home, Small Business, Enterprise, and so on. Why doesn't the company just bite the bullet and bring out various exploitable versions? Here are some suggestions:
Vista – Won't Boot Edition… $29.95
Vista – Preloaded with Viruses and Spyware Edition… $39.95
Vista – Initially Clean but Use at Your Own Risk Edition… $49.95
Vista – Clean with Firewall and Weekly Protection Update Edition… $200
You get the idea. How about this for a concept: One Version that Works Edition."

:oops:
Here it comes…

- http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060208/D8FKKGMO0.html
Feb 7, 2006
"SEATTLE (AP) - A new security service from Microsoft Corp. will charge users $49.95 per year to better protect its Windows operating system from spyware, viruses and other Internet attacks. Microsoft plans to release the product in early June. Called Windows OneCare Live, the subscription service will compete with security products made by traditional Microsoft partners, including Symantec Corp. and McAfee Inc. - although the software giant insists that its aim is not to run those companies out of business…"

:thumbdown: