FYI...
Fake Invoice - xls malware
- http://myonlinesecur...ke-xls-malware/
6 June 2014 - "June Invoice with a subject line of inovice <random number> June is another one from the current bot runs which try to drop cryptolocker, ransomware and loads of other malware on your computer. They are using email addresses and subjects that will entice a user to read the email and open the attachment. A very high proportion are being targeted at small and medium size businesses, with the hope of getting a better response than they do from consumers... Note the spelling mistake in the subject line of the email inovice 9667444 June rather than invoice. Email simply says:
This email contains an invoice file attachment
6 June 2014: invoice_9667444.zip ( 49kb) : Extracts to June_invoice_7846935978.xls.exe
Current Virus total detections: 1/51*
This June Invoice is another one of the spoofed icon files that unless you have “show known file extensions enabled“, will look like a proper xls ( Microsoft excel spread sheet) file instead of the .exe file it really is, so making it much more likely for you to accidentally open it and be infected..."
* https://www.virustot...b58a7/analysis/
___
Malicious major website ads lead to ransomware
Cisco said the attacks can be traced to advertisements on Disney, Facebook and The Guardian newspaper
- http://www.computerw...d_to_ransomware
June 6, 2014 - "Malicious advertisements on domains belonging to Disney, Facebook, The Guardian newspaper and others are leading people to malware that encrypts a computer's files until a ransom is paid, Cisco Systems has found*... Cisco's investigation unraveled a technically complex and highly effective way for infecting large number of computers with ransomware, which it described in detail on its blog*... The company noticed that it was blocking requests to 90 domains, many of those WordPress sites, for more than 17 percent of its CWS customers... many of the CWS users were ending up on those domains after viewing advertisements on high-traffic domains such as "apps.facebook .com," "awkwardfamilyphotos .com," "theguardian .co.uk" and "go .com," a Disney property, among many others. Certain advertisements that appeared on those domains, however, had been tampered with. If clicked, they redirected victims to one of the 90 domains. The style of attack, known as "malvertising," has long been a problem. Advertising networks have taken steps to try and detect malicious advertisements placed on their network, but the security checks aren't foolproof... The 90 domains the malicious advertisements pushed traffic to had also been hacked..."
* https://blogs.cisco....kit-strikes-oil
June 5, 2014 - "... we have seen RIG using malvertising to perform a drive-by attack on visitors to high profile, legitimate websites. This accounts for the high amount of traffic we have seen in the last month... Requests for RIG landing pages April 24 - May 22:
> http://blogs.cisco.c...art-550x314.png
___
Fake Pirate Bay uses tricks to push PUS
- http://www.f-secure....s/00002711.html
June 6, 2014 - "This is piratebay.com
> http://www.f-secure....ratebay_com.png
It's a cheap knockoff imitation of The Pirate Bay*. If you "search" for something — you'll be offered a custom named executable to download. Buried at the bottom of the page is this disclaimer:
> http://www.f-secure...._disclaimer.png
"Additional software may be offered to you"? Yeah… indeed it will. And the "decline" button is white text on gray on more gray. Very duplicitous.
> http://www.f-secure....p_discovery.png
In all, several applications are installed. Given the target audience, this probably takes advantage of kids. Lame. To be avoided..."
* http://en.wikipedia..../The_Pirate_Bay
___
Preying on Insecurity: Placebo Applications ...
- http://www.fireeye.c...amazon-com.html
June 4, 2014 - "FireEye mobile security researchers recently uncovered, and notified Google and Amazon to take down, a series of anti-virus and security configuration apps that were nothing more than scams. Written easily by a thieving developer with just a few hundred lines of code then covered with a facade of images and progress bars, the seemingly useful apps for Android’s operating environment charge for installation and upgrade but do nothing. In other words, placebo applications. Fortunately all the applications have been removed from the Google Play store due to our discovery. Up to 50,000 downloads in some cases, these -fake- apps highlight how cybercriminals are exploiting the security concerns consumers have about the Android platform. In this case, we found five (!) fake antivirus apps that do nothing other than take a security-conscious user’s money, leaves them unprotected from mobile threats, and earns a criminal thousands of dollars for little work... the paid versions of the apps were available for Google Play customers outside the US and UK, while users in the UK and US could choose the free versions with in-app upgrade options. Also available in third party markets such as appbrain.com[1] and amazon.com[2], the fraudulent apps ranged in price from free to $3.99. The applications included:
Anti-Hacker PLUS (com.minaadib.antihackerplus) Price $3.99
JU AntiVirus Pro (com.minaadib.juantiviruspro) Price $2.99
Anti-Hacker (com.minaadib.antihacker) Free
Me Web Secure (com.minaadib.mewebsecurefree) Free
Me Web Secure Pro (com.minaadib.mewebsecure) Price $1.99
Taking full advantage of the legacy, signature-based approach mobile antivirus apps have adopted, that makes it hard for a user to tell if it really is working, total charges for these “security” apps ran into the thousands of US dollars in the Google Play store alone. This old security model puts users relying on such applications at risk, either because it incites them to download apps that simply don’t have functionality – as we see in this case – or they don’t provide adequate protection against today’s threats. Ultimately, users simply cannot tell when they are protected..."
___
Six governments tap Vodafone calls
- http://www.reuters.c...N0EH0UK20140606
Jun 6, 2014 - "The world's second-biggest mobile phone company Vodafone revealed government agencies in six unidentified countries use its network to listen to and record customers' calls, showing the scale of telecom eavesdropping around the world... While most governments needed legal notices to tap into customers' communications, there were six countries where that was not the case, it said... Vodafone did not name the six for legal reasons... The Vodafone report, which is incomplete because many governments will not allow it to disclose requests, also linked to already-published national data which showed Britain and Australia making hundreds of thousands of requests. It showed that of the countries in which it operates, EU member Italy made the most requests for communication data. Germany, which expressed outrage when it was revealed last year that U.S. intelligence services had listened into the calls of Angela Merkel, also made requests to listen in to conversations and collect the data around them, such as where the calls were made and how long they lasted. Vodafone received no requests from the government of the United States because it does not have an operating licence there. It exited a joint mobile venture with Verizon last year..."
Edited by AplusWebMaster, 07 June 2014 - 05:31 AM.