
Defragment problems
#16
Posted 29 April 2008 - 03:40 AM
Abydos
Asking for Technical Help
Preventing Malware Slow PC? Recovery Console!
"I am not young enough to know everything" - Oscar Wilde
Register to Remove
#17
Posted 29 April 2008 - 04:43 AM
#18
Posted 29 April 2008 - 04:52 AM
"Click the radio button "define". (may be named differently), " All I see is a "SET" button. Is this it?
How do you reboot into safe mode?
Thanks
Hi Damare
Yes, "set" will do.
To reboot into safe mode, tap F8 right after bios screen, just keep tapping it till you reach a black screen with some boot-options. Choose safe mode without network. This load your windows with only a minimum of drivers, so your screen resolution may be higher.
Regards Abydos
Abydos
Asking for Technical Help
Preventing Malware Slow PC? Recovery Console!
"I am not young enough to know everything" - Oscar Wilde
#19
Posted 29 April 2008 - 06:43 AM
#20
Posted 29 April 2008 - 07:42 AM
Something is not right here. According to AMD, all 4 versions of the AMD Sempron 3300+ operate at 2GHz, not 797MHz..AMD Sempron Processor 3300+ 797MHz, 384 MB of Ram
The way your PF is setup is odd - at least in my experience. Most are managed by XP or Vista - and if you have at least 1Gb of RAM and plenty of free disk space, that works fine.My Page File stats - Drive C/space available - 25398MB. Custom size is "checked". Initial size MB 576 - Maximum size MB 1152 (nothing else "checked")
Total paging file size for all drives - minimum allowed 2MB/ Recommended 573MB/ Currently allocated 576MB. Is this good then?
But with this system, I find it odd how this Custom setup is setup because (1) is not fixed in size, and (2) the sizes are odd; the initial is set too small and where did 1152 come from? Yes, the PF size of 573Mb does conform with the old general rule-of-thumb of PF = RAM X 1.5, but that rule came about when tiny DOS what the primary OS on PCs - a long time ago. This rule is a good starting place (and one Windows still uses) but that's it.
You did not mention the model number of your Compaq, but most on-board graphics systems rob at least 16Mb, typically 32Mb (up to 128Mb) of system RAM and dedicate it to graphics processing. So 384 - 32 takes you down even further to only 352Mb of RAM - that's barely enough for XP and your arsenal of anti-malware programs - start doing something and you immediately start hitting the PF on your hard drive hard - forcing XP to expand the PF out towards the maximum in no time. Not only does this beat on the HD, it takes a few extra CPU cycles to gather up the extra space - and maybe some shuffling of data chunks to make space if crowded.
Understand this expansion/contraction of the PF does nothing but contributes to fragmentation problems. On big drives with lots of free space, this contribution is negligible. But on a crowded drive, it can have a detrimental impact on performance.
Therefore, I always recommend setting a "fixed size" (initial = maximum) Page File, and if it can be placed at the beginning of the disk, even better.
There is another aging rule-of-thumb that says the "sweet spot" for RAM and XP is 1Gb - sweet spot being that point where less RAM affects performance significantly, but more RAM offers little improvement. I have modified/updated my "sweet-spot" recommendations to 1Gb for single-core CPUs with XP, and 2Gb with multi-core CPUs and/or running Vista.
The only correct way to determine the size needed for your PF is to check your memory usage in Task Manager. Start Task Manager (Ctrl-Alt Delete) and click on the Performance tab. Look at the Commit Charge (K) section.
Total = amount of memory system is currently using
Limit = RAM + Page File
Peak = the maximum amount of memory your system has used since last reboot
For computers with less than 512Mb, and low free disk space, proper PF setup is very critical. Setting both the same size sets a "fixed" size Page File. Again, I would set to 1024 for both values, then watch the Peak values, adjust as necessary. Too little will cause low memory errors, too much wastes valuable disk space.
Having said all that, with small amounts of RAM, the hard drive will always be taking a beating - increasing wear and tear, and adding to heat concerns within the case. I urge you to increase your RAM - preferably to 1Gb (although 512Mb would still be good). This will greatly improve over-all performance, including your graphics processing, and it will ease some of the burden on your drive.
Make no mistake, when starting with only 384Mb of RAM, adding RAM provides the very best bang for the money in terms of significant, and very noticeable, performance gains.

Freedom is NOT Free!

Heat is the bane of all electronics!
─────────────────────
#21
Posted 30 April 2008 - 01:28 AM
#22
Posted 30 April 2008 - 06:36 AM
Generally to increase RAM, you add another module, or replace the existing module(s) with larger ones.How do I increase my RAM? What do I need to get? Is it expensive?
I don't know what you need because you still have not provided the exact model number. These popular RAM makers have auto-scanning and/or manual entry RAM wizards to help you determine compatible RAM. For manual entry, enter/select the PC or motherboard make and model number and the wizard will list compatible RAM.
Crucial - Memory Advisor
Corsair - Memory Configurator (manual data entry only)
GeIL - Memory Configurator (manual data entry only)
Kingston - Memory Search (manual data entry only)
Mushkin - Advisor
OCZ - Memory Configurator (manual data entry only)
Patriot - Memory Search (manual data entry only)
PNY - Memory Configurator (manual data entry only)
SuperTalent - Memory Finder (manual data entry only)
Newegg - Memory Configurator System Tool
MemoryStock - Upgrade Configurator
18004Memory? - Configurator
BTW, it would appear someone has already added some RAM to your system. 384Mb is not a common amount for a new system. So it would appear it initially came with 128Mb and someone added 256Mb, or the other way around; it came with 256Mb and 128Mb was added later. Be prepared to toss one or both existing modules into the spare parts bin - it is not likely you have more than two slots. If that were me, I would budget for 2 X 512Mb if possible and toss both existing modules. If the budget does not allow for that now, then 1 X 512Mb, then toss the 128 - assuming your motherboard accepts 512Mb modules.

Freedom is NOT Free!

Heat is the bane of all electronics!
─────────────────────
#23
Posted 01 May 2008 - 01:02 AM
#24
Posted 01 May 2008 - 01:50 AM
Abydos
Asking for Technical Help
Preventing Malware Slow PC? Recovery Console!
"I am not young enough to know everything" - Oscar Wilde
#25
Posted 01 May 2008 - 04:40 AM
Register to Remove
#26
Posted 01 May 2008 - 05:03 AM
Seems the odd number of 384 RAM comes from the fact that you actually have 512mb RAM, but your graphic is shared and takes 128 of them. Therefore you have 384mb RAM available.
According to your system spec's, your motherboard should support up to 2Gb's of 333Mhz DDR RAM. Heres a link where you can see all of your computer spec's:
Link
So, a buy of another 512mb would work. If the existing 512mb are divided in 2x256mb RAM, you might wanna go for 1-2x512 depending on your budget. (Have in mind that your graphic takes 128mb shared RAM of the total). As far as I can tell, you have two slots on your motherboard to put RAM in, of which either one or both are occupied, depending of the setup (1x512 or 2x256).
Regards Abydos
Abydos
Asking for Technical Help
Preventing Malware Slow PC? Recovery Console!
"I am not young enough to know everything" - Oscar Wilde
#27
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:14 AM
128 is a large chunk but that's what looks like is happening here.Seems the odd number of 384 RAM comes from the fact that you actually have 512mb RAM, but your graphic is shared and takes 128 of them.
Are you sure you don't have 2 page files?Page file space - 1.34GB
According to that specs page, your computer has,
Memory 512MB 333MHz DDR System Memory (2 Dimm)
Memory Max 2048mb

Freedom is NOT Free!

Heat is the bane of all electronics!
─────────────────────
#28
Posted 01 May 2008 - 06:49 AM
#29
Posted 01 May 2008 - 07:21 AM
"Are you sure you don't have 2 page files?"
No Im not sure. lol
Thanks for all the help...Abydos & Digerati! Now I know what to get and budget for.
btw...since I increased to 1024 on the page file for both values, its does seem to be running smoother, & quicker so far. Also have NOT had the "Virtual Memory Too Low" pop up. (and Ive been online a lot) Thanks again!
Hi Damare
You're very welcome.
As for finding out, wether you got one or two pagefiles, the easiest way is to:
Rightclick "my computer"
Choose "administer" in the right-click menu
You should now be in the computer administration area.
Click once on "disc management"
In the overview section, you should see your partitions, and what they are called. It will be noted if the partition or part of it is functioning as swap-file area. (most system partition will have a swap file).
Or through the pagefile setup screen. (Digerati gave you the direction to it earlier), there it would be listed aswell.
Could you please see if your system is using the D drive for pagefiling. Because that would explain why you have fragmented files there.
Regards Abydos
Abydos
Asking for Technical Help
Preventing Malware Slow PC? Recovery Console!
"I am not young enough to know everything" - Oscar Wilde
#30
Posted 01 May 2008 - 07:57 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users