FYI...
Q4 '09 web-based malware data and trends
-
http://blog.dasient....and-trends.html
January 26, 2010 - "... the way malware is being distributed is undergoing a fundamental shift, with
more attackers focusing on "drive-by downloads" from legitimate sites that have been compromised, or from sites designed specifically for malicious purposes. In nearly all the variations on this kind of attack, no user action is required for the infection to occur, beyond loading the site in a browser - and there are very few signs that malicious code has been downloaded... Based on the telemetry data we've gathered from the web, we estimate that more than 560,000 sites and approximately 5.5 million pages were infected in Q4'09, compared with more than 640,000 sites and 5.8 million pages in Q3'09. By the end of the year, we had identified
more than 100,000 web-based malware infections... we saw a more significant drop in the number of infected sites than we did in the number of infected pages because each infection tended to spread to a larger number of pages on each site... more than four of every 10 sites infected in the quarter were
reinfected within a space of three months... the file names most often used in drive-by downloads included things like "setup.exe," "update.exe" (which was used in the Google attack), and "install_flash_player.exe"... In previous years, a drive-by download would often initiate 10 or more extra processes, ostensibly in an attempt to maximize the return from each infected endpoint. In response, the search providers and anti-virus vendors who scan the web for infected sites began using the number of extra processes initiated as a signal that the webpage might be malicious. But in Q4'09, the average number of extra processes initiated was just 2.8 -- enough for a downloader and perhaps one or two pieces of malware. Clearly, attackers are getting smarter about the way they structure their attacks, opting for a smaller fingerprint on an infected machine in exchange for a greater likelihood of evading detection..."
Edited by AplusWebMaster, 26 January 2010 - 01:35 PM.