FYI…

- http://www.theregister.com/2006/10/18/spamhaus_fight_back/
18 October 2006
"Spamhaus has switched legal tack and decide to appeal an $11.7m judgment against it by a US court obtained by a firm it labelled a spammer. The London-based anti-spam organisation had argued that the court has no jurisdiction over it, but the threat of domain seizure has forced it to take action… In an updated statement on e360 Insight's lawsuit, Spamhaus* said it intends to "contest the ruling in order to stamp out further attempts by spammers to abuse the US court system". e360 Insight's rather different take on the case can be found here**. The cases has sparked a lively debate on the net with some deriding the court's decision while other, such as law professor Matthew Prince, commenting*** that Spamhaus has been ill-advised in its handling of the case."

* http://www.spamhaus.org/legal/answer.lasso?ref=3

** http://www.e360insight.com/

*** http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/664
October 7, 2006

> http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/688
October 20, 2006

.