I don't like your "sneaky" answer as I feel that an equivalency is not quite the same as an equality because it is really dealing with defining identities… rather than equality which calls for a solution. Yet, Except for mathematicians, I can see where "equation" is used in that situation.
Yes, my second answer was definitely not (strictly) mathematically correct, that's why I considered it to be a bit sneaky.
Hey everybody!
Just logged in, darn just when theres one up my alley lol. (maths problem).
Well done Achamian and Terry!
The only other thing I can come up with is if you read the matches backwards it is a true equation without having to move any matches.
XI = I+X or (11=1+10) in Roman numerals.
Chrissy
I think I see ur thinking there Elizabeth.
We can actually turn that into another roman numeral equation.
II + I = III or 2 + 1 = 3 by not actually moving any matches around, just "tweeking" them so as the X's become II.
But what I was really trying to show is that you don't even have to tweek them. Just leave as is. Remember the kinds of equations you learned in kindergarden where they used pictures of apples?
First, I will use smiley faces as an example.
[ ] + [ ] = [ ]
2 smileys + 1 smiley = 3 smileys
Take Chrissey's example and in your mind change the "roman numerals" to "matches"
| | + | = | | |
2 matches + 1 match = 3 matches
Now here's the part I always thought was so cool as a kid:
If the groups of smileys all stay in the same area, without leaping over the "gate" (my former teacher's name for "= ") you can arrange the smileys any way you like and your math "sentence" (former teacher's name for "equation") will still be TRUE !!!
Example:
…………………………………………,,,…[ ]
[ ]………+………[ ]……….=…….[ ]…………. JUST AS……..[ X ]…….+…….[ | ]….=….[| X ]
[ ]……………………………………….. [ ]
Your smileys didn't have to leap over the gate Elizabeth.
Just another way to view the matches, right?
If I were giving out the cookies, you could certainly have one