Posted 26 November 2012 - 01:24 PM
Obviously this is confusing and a complete injustice. We must help get things straightened out!
Who has been sentenced for dognapping? How do you know?
Posted 27 November 2012 - 05:32 AM
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:12 PM
Posted 12 December 2012 - 12:22 AM
Posted 01 February 2013 - 09:37 PM
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:17 PM
Posted 02 February 2013 - 12:42 AM
Posted 02 February 2013 - 01:33 AM
Posted 02 February 2013 - 09:21 AM
" The namesake of one crime was charged with the crime of which the namesake was charged with counterfeiting."
When I ran my truth table- this statement told me that Mr. Arson had to be charged with counterfeiting (we already knew he was convicted of embezzlement), but didn't tell me if it was Mr. Burglar or Mr. Embezzlement that was charged with arson. I had to work that out through process of elimination on my table.
Anyhow... Well done terry1966! That is the correct answer. Unfortunately, due to the time it took to resolve this issue - the defendants filed a dismissal motion claiming they were denied due process under the fair and speedy clause. The judge found in their favor and they were all released. It just so happens that three of the perpetrators have been picked up again on new charges and the other two joined the cabinet of the Obama administration where they are protected by executive privilege.
I've been making candied peanuts (very similar to toffee coated peanuts) to snack on. Have a few:
Posted 02 February 2013 - 10:12 AM
Similar Topics: Monday Madness x
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users