Welcome to What the Tech! ( Log In | Register ) What tech support ought to be... Fast, friendly and free! Once registered - you'll have the ability to post your question in the appropriate forum below. Additionally, if you can assist another member by sharing your tech knowledge, please post a reply! Best of all - Registration and all assistance is FREE! Once you've completed registration, simply choose the appropriate forum below, click on the "new topic" button, and post your question! What are you waiting for? Register today! *Registered users see NO ADVERTISING.
![]() ![]() |
Mar 10 2009, 07:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Authentic Member ![]() ![]() Group: Authentic Member Posts: 64 Joined: 1-October 08 From: New England Member No.: 81,759 Operating System: Windows XP Home and Pro |
Trend Micro PC-cillin came along with my Dell laptop...well, after a while it has stopped updating and is asking for a 1 year subscription...at $86 a pop!
With the plethoria of free anti-virus software out there, is there any real benefit to purchasing a subscription to their service, or would one be better served with one of the plethoria of free programs that exist on the market...AVG, Avira, Threatfire...would I be better of getting rid of PC-cillin in favor of one of these (or another as suggested by the forum)? Russ F |
|
|
|
Mar 10 2009, 08:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() SuperMember Group: Tech Team Posts: 1,798 Joined: 16-January 08 From: Denmark Member No.: 76,005 Operating System: WinXP SP3 |
Hi Russ
I would say pay vs. no pay depends entirely on your surfing habits and needs. I use entirely free security software, and haven't had any problems yet. But I also have a very disciplined approach to surfing. The most obvious benefit of buying a security suite, are usually better customer service and support. Bought programs usually have auto-update which their free cousins sometimes lacks, or they update more often. I have choosen my free programs with that in mind, so all my real-time protection updates very often, or at least as soon as new updates are available, compared to other free alternatives. One should also have hardware (RAM) in mind. As some programs use more resources than other. At the moment I use these security programs: Avast Anti-Virus : Updates often, sometimes several during the day. Comodo Firewall Pro. : Simply because I view it as the free Firewall at the moment. ThreatFire : Low on resources, updates often Spywareblaster : Manuel update, but once a month would suffice Spybot S&D : Manuel update, Immunazitaion only, no tea-timer. Both Spywareblaster and Spybot S&D are passive, meaning they use no resources. Some thinks that Spybot S&D are over the hills, but I say why not include it, as it uses no resources other than a little space on the HD. I also use Malwarebytes Anti-malware as a on-demand scanner, and I use various on-line scanners as well. Such as Linkscanner if I have doubts of a certain webpage. But have a look in the link below in my signature, Preventing Malware, for more choices. Regards |
|
|
|
Mar 10 2009, 10:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() SuperMember Group: Tech Classroom Posts: 2,709 Joined: 21-March 06 From: Australia Member No.: 52,151 Operating System: Windows XP/SP3 |
Hi Russ,
Good advice from Abydos - In my signature Learning each day, there is also a suggested guide for you to follow to keep your computer running well. kind regards, |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 10:43 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Honors Grad Group: Malware Team Posts: 328 Joined: 27-August 06 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 60,678 Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition Dutch |
This is what I usually tell people after the cleaning process. Especially Kaspersky is great
Hope that helps. Like tallin said this link also says the same and sometimes more, so good to read: http://forums.whatthetech.com/Computer_Tip...413#entry533413 |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2009, 11:58 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
New Member ![]() Group: New Member Posts: 1 Joined: 24-March 09 Member No.: 84,841 Operating System: Win Vista Home Premium |
Just get the new NIS 2k9, I wouldn’t have recommended a Symantec product but the new one really does shine. I was a die hard nod32 user prior to them releasing v4, and having some early runtime issues. NIS 2k9 is extremely light, using only around 7MB of memory when idling, and it scans very fast (the fastest scanner by far). It also has a powerful two way firewall and updates itself every 5 to 15 minutes.
Norton Internet Security 2k9 is quite cheap, around the same price as eset nod32 http://www.checkoutsoftware.com/symantec/n...rity-2009_p4996 |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2009, 01:46 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Authentic Member ![]() ![]() Group: Authentic Member Posts: 48 Joined: 25-November 08 Member No.: 82,563 Operating System: windows xp sp2 |
G'day Russ
Just a little input from me as well, Though I'm no expert. I have trendmicro/pc cillin paid version. However I sometimes find that it'll let viruses and trojan varrents through without detection, I use the malwarebytes-antimalware quite often which has always detected the unwanted that trend did not. I have tried to ask about this in the past but always get the same ole responce from trendmicro ( makesure your trend software is updated daily and so on) Even though I have it set to auto update. I will say this though any major problem I have been unable to sort and solve on my own the fine knowledge of the WTT guys have been helpful as. With easy instructions and knowledge of what they're doing and so on. Kudos toém. |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2009, 09:51 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Silver Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Authentic Member Posts: 436 Joined: 30-October 05 From: Maryland Member No.: 42,715 Operating System: win xp sp3 |
Aby
>> I have choosen my free programs with that in mind, so all my real-time protection updates very often, I thought one was not supposed to have more than one real time protection enabled; am I wrong? I enable Mcafee security suite's ral time protection(free for Comcast customers). I also have Windows Defender, and a hardware firewall/router. Should I enable Defender's RTP also? |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2009, 11:09 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() SuperMember Group: Tech Team Posts: 1,798 Joined: 16-January 08 From: Denmark Member No.: 76,005 Operating System: WinXP SP3 |
Hi GP
QUOTE I thought one was not supposed to have more than one real time protection enabled; am I wrong? No you are not. I can't figure where you got the extra real-time protection from... The basic rule is: 1 of each doing real-time protection; Firewall, AV and Anti-Spyware. The problems come when two of the same type of applications is running alongside each other. Stepping on each others toes one could say, as they have the same area to protect. This still happens occasionally across applications, what we call conflicts or compatibility problems. Both SpywareBlaster and SpyBot S&D are passive. Using no Tea-timer (The real-time protection in Spybot) but only the immunization part of Spybot, and the plugin for IE browser. QUOTE I enable Mcafee security suite's ral time protection(free for Comcast customers). I also have Windows Defender, and a hardware firewall/router. Should I enable Defender's RTP also? If Mcafee have real-time protection vs. Anti-spyware, I see no need for it. But I don't know Mcafee's products well enough to answer that fully, for that you'll have to wait on others to answer it. Hope this clears it up, otherwise just ask ahead Cheers This post has been edited by Abydos: Apr 13 2009, 11:15 AM |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
37 | T.C. | 511 | Yesterday, 02:41 PM Last post by: CatByte |
|||
![]() |
30 | Terrik | 416 | Yesterday, 09:13 AM Last post by: Tomk |
|||
![]() |
2 | AplusWebMaster | 361 | 4th November 2009 - 07:38 AM Last post by: AplusWebMaster |
|||
![]() |
2 | AplusWebMaster | 116 | 3rd November 2009 - 06:42 AM Last post by: AplusWebMaster |
|||
|
Time is now: 7th November 2009 - 04:09 PM |