Welcome! Register for a free account (or login) > How does it work?
|
|


Oct 14 2009, 09:39 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() AplusWebMaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Authentic Member Posts: 4,564 Joined: 30-December 03 From: USA Member No.: 1,643 Operating System: XP/SP3 |
FYI...
Banking online - Erosion of trust... - http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/er...ne-banking.html October 13, 2009 - "Two very influential people have made public comments recently that could lead to widespread distrust of the Windows operating system for online banking. Last week, FBI Director Robert Mueller related in a speech in San Francisco that he had received a phishing email that tried to steal his banking credentials and nearly fell for it. As a consequence, he is not doing his banking on line... This week, Washington Post columnist Brian Krebs, who writes the “Security Fix” column and is among the most influential writers in the computer security space, wrote* that businesses should simply stop doing their banking online from machines with the Windows operating system. He wrote: “The simplest, most cost-effective answer I know of? Don't use Microsoft Windows when accessing your bank account online”... “…regardless of the methods used by the bank or the crooks, all of the attacks shared a single, undeniable common denominator: They succeeded because the bad guys were able to plant malicious software that gave them complete control over the victim's Windows computer,” he wrote. “While there are multiple layers of protection that businesses and banks could put in place, the cheapest and most foolproof solution is to use a read-only, bootable operating system, such as Knoppix, or Ubuntu”... * http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityf...rnet_banki.html Krebs has done a series of columns recently about small and medium-size businesses, non-profit organizations and schools losing tens of thousands of dollars to cyber thieves using banking Trojans to provide access to their bank accounts and transfer funds to money mules. The implications of this loss of trust have been mentioned by other significant observers in the computer security world. David Kennedy, Manager of Risk Analysis at Verizon Business, wrote in his weekly intelligence summary** for his company’s customers: “Reports the FBI director’s spouse refuses to allow on-line banking is a serious indictment of on-line trust and we will be tracking related reports of trust erosion, especially by high-profile individuals, groups and companies.” ** http://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/20...ary-2009-10-09/ "...we agree with ScanSafe’s assessment*** they were probably the result of malcode infections and not phishing. The scale of this infection/breach is more significant to enterprise security than the web e-mail accounts that were compromised..." *** http://blog.scansafe.com/journal/2009/10/7...data-theft.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 14 2009, 11:15 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() AplusWebMaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Authentic Member Posts: 4,564 Joined: 30-December 03 From: USA Member No.: 1,643 Operating System: XP/SP3 |
From the Krebs article:
- http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityf...rnet_banki.html October 8, 2009 - "... As a consumer, having your online banking account credentials stolen -- either via phishing or through password-stealing malicious software -- can be a harrowing experience, but it is usually not a costly one. The federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act ("Regulation E"), limits consumer liability for unauthorized transactions to $50, provided notice is given within 10 business days, or to $500 provided notice is given within 60 business days. Even so, retail banks often will work to make whole those customers who are victims of cyber fraud. On the other hand, business that bank online enjoy hardly any such protection. The precise obligations of a commercial bank and their business customers are spelled out in the agreement that those companies sign, but generally business customers agree to notify their bank of any suspicious or unauthorized transactions on the same day that the transaction in question occurs. Even then, there is no guarantee that the bank will be able to block or reverse any fraudulent transfers..." ... so, keeping in mind that NOTHING on the web is 100% safe (as has been mentioned many times by others for years), I'm not certain "... what exactly is being recommended". This is just another -risk- that has to be dealt with. So, IMHO, I see it as an individual's judgment call deciding how to proceed, measuring "Risk -vs- reward". I posted it to get the information out in the open. I wish there were a better answer, but I don't see one, yet. . |
|
|
|
AplusWebMaster Banking online - Erosion of trust... Oct 14 2009, 09:39 AM
Doug Thank you AplusWebMaster,
Will you please expand ... Oct 14 2009, 10:18 AM![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
4 | Jkc73 | 65 | 10th March 2010 - 10:21 AM Last post by: CatByte |
|||
![]() |
9 | HSRW101 | 354 | 11th January 2010 - 12:03 PM Last post by: jpshortstuff |
|||
![]() |
1 | Samu | 363 | 19th November 2009 - 11:18 AM Last post by: Doug |
|||
![]() |
26 | stargazercece | 1,796 | 9th October 2009 - 02:06 PM Last post by: Tomk |
|||
|
Time is now: 16th March 2010 - 06:22 AM |